Akeneo vs. Inriver: Insights from Info-Tech’s’ Head-to-Head Comparison
Modern PIM buyers want platforms that feel intuitive, evolve quickly, and help their teams work smarter across every channel. SoftwareReviews, powered by Info-Tech, released a head-to-head comparison of Akeneo Product Cloud and Inriver PIM earlier this year that highlights just how dramatically the PIM landscape is changing and why more organizations are gravitating toward solutions designed for flexibility, usability, and real-world impact.
Choosing the right Product Information Management (PIM) solution has never been more important. With customers expecting accurate, compelling, and consistent product information across every channel, brands are investing heavily in tools that make their product experiences shine. But with so many platforms on the market, each offering different features, promises, and levels of support, it can be difficult to know which solution will truly empower your teams and deliver long-term value.
That’s where independent, data-driven analysis becomes invaluable. Released earlier this year by Info-Tech, SoftwareReviews’ head-to-head comparison offers one of the most comprehensive views into how two leading PIM solutions, Akeneo Product Cloud and Inriver PIM, perform in the real world.
If you’re looking for clear, actionable, and unbiased insights, this year’s findings provide exactly that. Below, we break down the results into an approachable, easy-to-read guide that highlights where each vendor stands and what it means for organizations striving to deliver better product experiences.
The New PIM Reality: Usability and Flexibility Matter More Than Ever
Not long ago, PIM projects were often defined by customization, long deployments, and complex admin requirements. But in 2025, companies want the opposite:
- Shorter onboarding time
- Cleaner user interfaces
- More intuitive workflows
- Less dependency on IT
That preference shows up loudly in this year’s data, with Akeneo receiving a 90% satisfaction score in usability and intuitiveness compared to Inriver’s 70%. Users repeatedly report that Akeneo feels lighter, easier to navigate, and better suited to cross-team collaboration, which is a major advantage as merchandising, marketing, eCommerce, and digital teams all take a seat at the product-content table.

Ease of data integration is also a key differentiator. Akeneo’s stronger ratings here hint at what many brands already know from experience: connecting PIM into the broader ecosystem (eCommerce, DAM, ERP, CMS) is where much of the project’s true value is unlocked. When integration feels seamless rather than strenuous, teams can move faster, experiment more, and deliver richer product experiences with less friction.
Feature-Rich Is Good. Feature-Useful Is Better.
One of the most interesting takeaways from the report is how users evaluate features. While both platforms offer the foundational PIM capabilities brands expect, When it comes to product feature functionality, Akeneo received an overall satisfaction score of 84%, while Inriver PIM averaged 70%.
Akeneo particularly excelled in areas such as:
- Workflow & approval management
- Product data analytics
- Advanced search & filtering
- Omnichannel information delivery

What does this tell us? Companies want to learn from their product data. They want insights about completeness, consistency, accuracy, translation needs, and readiness for every channel. Akeneo’s approach to analytics, built purposely for merchandisers and marketers, seems to resonate with what teams actually need.
This trend continues in workflow and governance features. Strong scores for Akeneo reflect a platform that supports content operations without requiring overly rigid, IT-heavy configuration.
Innovation Is An Expectation
To better understand a customer’s long-term relationship with a vendor, Info-Tech’s SoftwareReviews calculates an “Emotional Footprint” to quantify the emotional sentiment held by end users of the software based on their experience with the vendor. The Emotional Footprint assesses five key areas: strategy & innovation, service experience, product experience, negotiation & contract, and conflict resolution.
Overall, Akeneo outperformed Inriver in three of the five considerations for the Emotional Footprint, with a particular lead in the product experience category:
- Reliable: Akeneo +97 vs. Inriver +71
- Enables Productivity: +97 vs. +77
- Performance Enhancing: +89 vs. +71
- Security Protects: +84 vs. +76

One of the clearest signals in the Emotional Footprint scores is that users deeply value a vendor’s momentum. Akeneo earns notably higher marks for being “continually improving,” “inspiring,” and “helping users innovate.”
In other words, customers feel the platform is moving in the right direction — fast.

This lines up with what’s happening across the PIM market as a whole. AI-powered enrichment, automated product data quality checks, smarter workflows, and customer-influenced product content are becoming essential differentiators. Brands need a provider that’s not only building for where the market is today, but where it’s going.
Meet with an Akeneo Expert Today to Start Your PX Journey
What This Means If You’re Evaluating PIM in 2025
Stepping back from the individual scores, the report paints a bigger picture about where the PIM market is headed and what buyers are prioritizing as they plan for the next wave of digital transformation. Whether you’re replacing a legacy system, consolidating tools, or building a more modern product experience stack, the data offers several important insights about how teams are thinking today.
1. Teams want PIM platforms that feel like modern SaaS, not legacy enterprise tools.
PIM used to be synonymous with complexity: long implementation timelines, heavy customization, and interfaces that only a small group of specialists could navigate confidently. But that model no longer fits how companies operate. Today’s digital teams expect their PIM to feel as intuitive as the rest of their modern SaaS ecosystem. They need a system that anyone, from merchandising to eCommerce to marketing, can log into and understand without a training marathon.
2. Innovation is becoming a core purchasing criterion.
A stagnant PIM is a short-lived PIM.
There was a time when a stable feature set was enough to keep buyers satisfied; that era is gone. With AI reshaping everything from content creation to product recommendations to search experiences, and with customer expectations shifting faster than ever, businesses now need a PIM provider that keeps evolving.
Brands are making increasingly strategic PIM decisions, and they’re gravitating toward partners who demonstrate momentum, vision, and a track record of delivering meaningful enhancements.
3. Product experience is now the company experience.
One of the biggest mindset shifts in recent years is that product data is no longer viewed as a back-office asset but as a customer-facing one. The accuracy, richness, and completeness of product information now directly influence conversion, loyalty, return rates, SEO, and even the perceived quality of the brand.
In other words: the product experience is the customer experience.
Because of this, companies are placing greater emphasis on consistency and reliability. They need PIM platforms that support omnichannel delivery, make enrichment easy for non-technical teams, and offer analytics that surface gaps before they become customer problems. Platforms that deliver strong product experience capabilities ultimately help brands connect more confidently and authentically with their audiences.
4. Emotional sentiment strongly predicts long-term success.
Info-Tech’s SoftwareReviews report highlights something many tech buyers have long suspected but rarely measure: how a solution makes users feel matters just as much as what it can do. A positive vendor relationship typically correlates with smoother implementations, higher adoption, and greater ROI.
Emotional sentiment is especially important in PIM, where success depends on collaboration across merchandising, marketing, eCommerce, compliance, and IT. If a platform frustrates people or feels unnecessarily complex, adoption will lag and data quality will suffer. But if it feels supportive and empowering, teams are more likely to champion it, maintain data standards, and share ownership of product content, all of which form the foundation of a healthy product experience ecosystem.
The Bottom Line for PIM Buyers
So what can we take away from Info-Tech’s SoftwareReviews report? Companies are gravitating toward PIM solutions that combine strong functionality with strong usability and a strong vendor relationship. Akeneo’s leadership across innovation, product experience, emotional sentiment, and feature satisfaction suggests it’s hitting the mark for the needs of today’s product-driven organizations.
Inriver remains a respectable choice, with particular strengths that may matter to certain buyers. But when viewed through the lens of where the market is heading, toward flexibility, speed, and customer-influenced product experience, Akeneo’s momentum is hard to ignore.
If you’re choosing a PIM in 2025, the takeaway is simple: look beyond features, and evaluate how each platform helps your teams work smarter, collaborate better, and prepare for the future of product experience.
You can download the full head-to-head report today to explore all the findings and decide which PIM is right for your organization.
Are you ready to take the next step?
Our Akeneo Experts are here to answer all the questions you might have about our products and help you to move forward on your PX journey.


